Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
First DirecTV and AT&T... now Time Warner.
This thread has 10 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Thursday October 20, 2016 at 19:11
King of typos
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2002
5,281
Have fun ya'll.

[Link: 9to5mac.com]

KOT
Post 2 made on Thursday October 20, 2016 at 19:33
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
Never mind. I realize now this is for the studio, not the cable company
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

Post 3 made on Thursday October 20, 2016 at 19:36
GotGame
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
4,022
Charter and TW merged into "Spectrum" aka " the Borg".
I may be schizophrenic, but at least I have each other.
Post 4 made on Friday October 21, 2016 at 02:09
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
Btw, AOL is currently telling ATT what a fabulous idea this merger is. If you still own AT&T, dump it now while it still has some value.
[Link: marketwatch.com]
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

Post 5 made on Friday October 21, 2016 at 09:38
highfigh
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
8,322
On October 21, 2016 at 02:09, Fins said...
Btw, AOL is currently telling ATT what a fabulous idea this merger is. If you still own AT&T, dump it now while it still has some value.
[Link: marketwatch.com]

I don't know how accurate the nfo was, but an ATT installer told me they have stopped repairing/installing copper wire in the field and are only installing fiber because the cost is too high and they would rather spend the money on upgrades, rather than infrastructure that will be replaced, anyway. He also said they lose money on U-Verse, so the DirecTV/Dish installs/subscriptions are the main push/source of profit because the existing cabling infrastructure is old and basically crumbling.

IMO, their tech support, some installers and the lack of training is costing them more than they think and they're the main reasons I'm thinking of switching to another provider for internet but if the providers continue to merge, it's moot.

This is what happens when an industry is de-regulated.
My mechanic told me, "I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder."
OP | Post 6 made on Friday October 21, 2016 at 09:52
King of typos
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2002
5,281
The telephone company in my area has promised that my house will get faster speeds than DSL. Which is 5 to 6MBps down and 0.5 MBps up. This has been a promise for 10 plus years.

There is a fiber optic line 3 houses down... but it stops on the other side of a 10' wide creek. Not sure why though. I wonder which would be cheaper... for them to go back to an overhead pole and track over to the next pole on the other side then back to underground. Or to trench the creek. Either way, this fiber has been there since the 80's.

Thankfully Comcast has the ability to provide faster internet... 160 down and 15 up.

KOT
Post 7 made on Friday October 21, 2016 at 13:46
weddellkw
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2013
186
On October 21, 2016 at 09:38, highfigh said...
I don't know how accurate the nfo was, but an ATT installer told me they have stopped repairing/installing copper wire in the field and are only installing fiber because the cost is too high and they would rather spend the money on upgrades, rather than infrastructure that will be replaced, anyway.

I recall reading similar reports re: Verizon, their union employeers and the strikes earlier this year.

Meanwhile the big providers are fighting tooth and nail to prevent municipalities and other players from providing new options...
Post 8 made on Friday October 21, 2016 at 14:26
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
On October 21, 2016 at 09:52, King of typos said...
The telephone company in my area has promised that my house will get faster speeds than DSL. Which is 5 to 6MBps down and 0.5 MBps up. This has been a promise for 10 plus years.

There is a fiber optic line 3 houses down... but it stops on the other side of a 10' wide creek. Not sure why though. I wonder which would be cheaper... for them to go back to an overhead pole and track over to the next pole on the other side then back to underground. Or to trench the creek. Either way, this fiber has been there since the 80's.

Thankfully Comcast has the ability to provide faster internet... 160 down and 15 up.

KOT

Is the fiber that was installed in the 80's useable now? I thought I had a technician tell me that all of the fiber installed back then was obsolete now because the technology had changed from back when they installed big bundles of multiple strands.
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

OP | Post 9 made on Friday October 21, 2016 at 15:09
King of typos
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2002
5,281
On October 21, 2016 at 14:26, Fins said...
Is the fiber that was installed in the 80's useable now? I thought I had a technician tell me that all of the fiber installed back then was obsolete now because the technology had changed from back when they installed big bundles of multiple strands.

The same can be said for the copper wire installed in the 80's... 1880's lol But their still being used.

I honestly can't see there being a reason why they can't use that fiber. I understand where you're coming from, but any fiber would be better than the copper.

It seeing how my area has gone from SNET to ATT to SBC and back to ATT in the last 20 to 25 years. Despite having the same work force. I can only see them being taught new rules for each company. Rather than new technology. You know, it's all about the rapport with the customer, but never about the 100 year old technology.

KOT
Post 10 made on Friday October 21, 2016 at 16:19
iimig
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2011
1,154
On October 21, 2016 at 14:26, Fins said...
Is the fiber that was installed in the 80's useable now? I thought I had a technician tell me that all of the fiber installed back then was obsolete now because the technology had changed from back when they installed big bundles of multiple strands.

The number of strands really doesn't matter. Since the 1980s utilities have been dealing in single mode fiber. It is almost entirely different from our side of things which is multi mode. Single mode diameters have in fact changed (very) slightly over the years but we are talking 1.3 micron to 1.55.
The less I say, the smarter I will appear
Post 11 made on Saturday October 22, 2016 at 10:47
highfigh
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
8,322
On October 21, 2016 at 13:46, weddellkw said...
I recall reading similar reports re: Verizon, their union employers and the strikes earlier this year.

Meanwhile the big providers are fighting tooth and nail to prevent municipalities and other players from providing new options...

Yeah, that's the great thing about monopolies.
My mechanic told me, "I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder."


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse