Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
question about mrf 260's
This thread has 17 replies. Displaying posts 1 through 15.
Post 1 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 17:28
KacperMik
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2016
23
Hey guys, I currently have a setup where one mrf 260 is plugged into a few devices, and the other into a few others. My problem is that I am trying to incorporate the volume, input change, and mute from the receiver thats connected to one of the mrf 260s, while leaving every other button connected to the other mrf 260. So the receiver im using is connected to one mrf station and the cable box to the other. Is there a way for me to be able to send a signal to both stations through the mx-900 editor or even be able to program a separate button for a certain station? Any tips or help would be appreciated! Thanks!
Post 2 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 17:57
iform
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2010
760
Why do you have 2 mrf260s? How far away are they?
OP | Post 3 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 18:40
KacperMik
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2016
23
On September 1, 2016 at 17:57, iform said...
Why do you have 2 mrf260s? How far away are they?

i have 2 mrf 260s, because im using 1 receiver setup for one of them and one for the other, the only issue is though that we only have 1 cable box so we split the video for that one, however the cable box is attached to 1 mrf base, while the receiver i need is attached to the other. Also they are about 2 feet apart. (i know i could simply switch the bug and plug it into the other base, but then i wouldnt be able to use the other receiver for cable.)
Post 4 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 18:51
kgossen
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2008
3,026
As long as both 260's are in the same CCP file with the 880, I don't see a problem. This is incredibly easy to do. Just make sure they don't have the same ID.
"Quality isn't expensive, it's Priceless!"
Post 5 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 19:28
goldenzrule
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
8,474
They don't even have to be in the same file. Just add a second base, assign RFID and ports, done.
OP | Post 6 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 19:29
KacperMik
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2016
23
On September 1, 2016 at 18:51, kgossen said...
As long as both 260's are in the same CCP file with the 880, I don't see a problem. This is incredibly easy to do. Just make sure they don't have the same ID.

I know what you mean, but ill try to provide an example. So the cable box is under station id 1 and the receiver is under station id 2. So when im setting the remote up and create a button for Cable under WATCH, i want the volume to be from the receiver thats connected to station 2, and the rest of the buttons for the remote connected to station 1, but when i go to RF control in the program tab, I am unable to use both the receivers at once.
Post 7 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 19:41
kgossen
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2008
3,026
If you're referring to punch through, then no, I don't think you can. Because you have 2 receivers, you have to manually program it. It's still SUPER easy.

Why would you want to use 2 AVR's at the exact same time? (I'm assuming you have 2 AVR's as you refer to receivers and stations)

If you want a hand, PM me.
"Quality isn't expensive, it's Priceless!"
Post 8 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 21:30
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
On September 1, 2016 at 19:29, KacperMik said...
I know what you mean, but ill try to provide an example. So the cable box is under station id 1 and the receiver is under station id 2. So when im setting the remote up and create a button for Cable under WATCH, i want the volume to be from the receiver thats connected to station 2, and the rest of the buttons for the remote connected to station 1, but when i go to RF control in the program tab, I am unable to use both the receivers at once.

Send me the file and I can fix it. I charge $125 an hour.


Oh, and throw out those awful 260's and get an mrf350
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

Post 9 made on Friday September 2, 2016 at 02:48
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
Fins hits the nail on the head.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 10 made on Friday September 2, 2016 at 08:40
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
Thank you Ernie
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

Post 11 made on Friday September 2, 2016 at 11:40
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
You're welcome. I especially like the part where you offer to take him out of our misery by doing it for him at a reasonable price.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 12 made on Friday September 2, 2016 at 13:43
musictoo
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2005
542
You should be able to add 2 mrf's to the project and IR route as needed. Am I missing something?
Post 13 made on Friday September 2, 2016 at 15:09
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
You're missing that the MRF260 is a very useful product if you're nowhere near any kind of RF transmission except that of the remote.

The MRF260's RF is so poorly done that a solution for interference is to remove the antenna. The only thing that is supposed to pick up a signal... take that off and the rest of the product receives RF just fine. In normal circumstances inside, say, cities and towns, with buildings less than 150 feet from one another, this product is easily overpowered by interference that better products, say the MRF350, or a crystal radio, would reject.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 14 made on Friday September 2, 2016 at 15:27
Total Control Remotes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2006
2,987
Not to take anything away from the MRF-260 because I have used it with success on many jobs...but I just kind of forget that it even exists and pretend the MRF-350 and MRX-2 are the only RF base units. It's not a crap shot, but sometimes you can't hide those things from the type of interference that is so often found at client sites.

If you do sell them, keep some MRF-350's in the truck.
Post 15 made on Friday September 2, 2016 at 15:30
Eastside A/V
Select Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2006
1,782
As discussed you should change over to an MRF350; but regardless you need to create Macro's that Alias the functions from other 'devices' with the proper codes and rf (and emitter) routing info.
Bryan Levy
www.eastsideav.com
Gallery: [Link: eastsideav.com]
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse