And SHE lies daily about emails/finance/relationship/job accomplishments (open mouth, insert lie here), etc, pushes conspiracy theories of Trump being a recruiter for ISIS (hmmm, odd that doesnt get ANYWHERE near the air time of Trump stating she is the founder of ISIS. VERY interesting and very telling!), talks seriously about importing millions of immigrants, persecutes Christians and white males, promotes violence by supporting racist groups like Black Lives Matter and Muslim Brotherhood, is cavalier about national security, not sure if she even knows how to tweet.

Just wanted to balance out the equation here to make it even. Neither is a saint.

Buy hey, more duckets in her pocketz! (whatever that means).

You didn't balance out anything. You just showed how imbalanced you are.

Her stating Trump is a recruitment tool for ISIS isn't a conspiracy theory, it's rationality. ISIS wants a war, wants the US to respond with aggression: Trump plays right into it with anti-Muslim rhetoric.

I'm interested to hear how Clinton is persecuting white males and religion. Let me pull up chair, this should be good. Not to mention supporting BLM is supporting terror. That's a pretty tortured rationale. Start water boarding that bad boy.

Donald Trump now being used in terrorist propaganda videos, Hillary Clinton says

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>

Yeah, Clinton lies so vote for Trump. At least we can trust him! ;)

[Link: politifact.com]
[Link: politifact.com]


Oh yea, I forgot. Politifact is a tool of the liberal media. :)

[Link: thefederalistpapers.org]

and

[Link: pjmedia.com]

All that 80s Arkansas cocaine slinging were just the beginning.

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>

Sure just link anything. It's all the same!

[Link: theonion.com]

[Link: infowars.com]

[Link: mediamatters.org]

[Link: theintellectualist.co]

Credible information must be countered with disinformation.

Good to see you're following your own advice. Well done!
 ...But due to a strange brew of incentives that proved toxic—the competition for eyeballs, the lack of subject matter expertise, the industry standard of reportorial balance—the mainstream media did nothing to puncture this myth. To the contrary, it treated the threat of indictment as a permanent question mark hovering over Clinton’s campaign like a dark cloud. In a different media ecosystem, this wouldn’t have happened. A mix of common sense and truly basic research and reporting would have established a consensus that Republicans were trying to gin up intrigue and damaging innuendo, but that an indictment was extraordinarily unlikely. Instead, the remote odds of one came to be seen as something like a 50-50 proposition, to the point where even professional Democrats began to worry Clinton might be charged with a felony and prosecuted.

This crap is going to go on for years and she will be blamed for by the Party of Personal Responsibility and it's supporters.

“This is but another example that social media is not an effective platform to engage in complex dialog on seemingly intractable critical issues that have varied histories and contested understandings.They create more heat than light and invite extreme viewpoints that intentionally obfuscate the nuanced context that surrounds these issues.” - Melvin Oliver

"Social Media is a room full of mirrors. At first it will shock, horrify and enrage but eventually everyone will have to face their true self. Luckily humanity is capable of and comfortable with living in denial." ~39 Cent Stamp

Let me throw this one out for our Hitlary sycophants... add killing innocent American church kids and their mothers to her dirty deeds.

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>

So Hillary ordered the deaths of the Branch Davidians at Waco? LOL

The people who signed up to be a Branch Davidian pretty much sealed their own fate. David works in mysterious ways i guess. It was all part of Davids plan. Sounds crazy to me but what do i know.