Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 3 of 4
Topic:
OT, just cant get a break with these insurance people
This thread has 49 replies. Displaying posts 31 through 45.
OP | Post 31 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 06:15
thecapnredfish
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2008
1,397
1k. And it is the principle. The fact it went to collections. Nothing done wrong on my end and I intend to fight.
Post 32 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 07:57
Bubby
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
942
On March 16, 2016 at 20:31, thecapnredfish said...
It is Florida.

Isn't Florida a no-fault state? So shouldn't their insurance pay for their car?
Post 33 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 08:14
King of typos
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2002
5,280
Even if the claim is legit, which I believe you that it's not. Having it go to collections only after 45 days is beyond ridiculous.

I would've though a normal "bill" would have gone out. Than another with a late fee/miss payment attached to it. Then possibility a certified letter. Which should've taken 3 months.

Still, $1,000 is a lot of damage for a claim that has no police report. Thus no factual time and date. I wonder what the description of said vehicle it was that "you" were driving. Oh wait, no police report.

KOT
Post 34 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 08:27
buzz
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2003
4,371
$1k sounds suspiciously like a nuisance scam. It's a low threshold where everyone pays and settles, rather than fight, because the costs of fighting are likely more than the disputed amount. The patent trolls are running a similar extortion scam.
OP | Post 35 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 10:22
thecapnredfish
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2008
1,397
On March 17, 2016 at 08:14, King of typos said...
Even if the claim is legit, which I believe you that it's not. Having it go to collections only after 45 days is beyond ridiculous.

I would've though a normal "bill" would have gone out. Than another with a late fee/miss payment attached to it. Then possibility a certified letter. Which should've taken 3 months.

Still, $1,000 is a lot of damage for a claim that has no police report. Thus no factual time and date. I wonder what the description of said vehicle it was that "you" were driving. Oh wait, no police report.

KOT

We were given the date of said incident and town. We were asked the color and vehicle make by progressive. Of course if you have access to tag numbers you have access to color, make, model, owner and address.
OP | Post 36 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 10:25
thecapnredfish
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2008
1,397
On March 17, 2016 at 07:57, Bubby said...
Isn't Florida a no-fault state? So shouldn't their insurance pay for their car?

Correct. They did pay for the damage I can not see, but they want reimbursement. But they feel my car needs to be brought to one of their inspection locations. Dont think so. It can go to my carrier for inspection.
Post 37 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 10:36
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
I've been running a dash cam since I got the new van.  It's powered by an auxiliary circuit that powers up the camera any time a door is opened or whenever the vehicle is running and then stays on for 30 minutes after any activity in the vehicle.

It has GPS tracking along with the video and while they might say you erased the video of the accident, the GPS tracking may have been enough to prove that you were in another area and not near the accident scene.

I don't have any experience with this kind of thing, but curious why your insurance company isn't more involved in either fighting or settling this.  The few times I've needed my auto insurance, it's been really hands off for me.
www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
Post 38 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 11:30
King of typos
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2002
5,280
On March 17, 2016 at 10:22, thecapnredfish said...
We were given the date of said incident and town. We were asked the color and vehicle make by progressive. Of course if you have access to tag numbers you have access to color, make, model, owner and address.

You're right that they'll have access to Y/M/M and color via the tag number. But I was curious onto what the witness said was the Y/M/M and color. With a tag number of ABC-123. Trying to figure out if the tag number was mixed up some how here.

So if your vehicle is a 2012 Ford Connect white. And the actual vehicle is a 2009 Chevy van and black. But has a tag of ABC-132. Then having the witness describe what the vehicle was, would've made this an open/shut case for you.

KOT
Post 39 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 11:31
King of typos
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2002
5,280
On March 17, 2016 at 10:36, SB Smarthomes said...
I've been running a dash cam since I got the new van.  It's powered by an auxiliary circuit that powers up the camera any time a door is opened or whenever the vehicle is running and then stays on for 30 minutes after any activity in the vehicle.

It has GPS tracking along with the video and while they might say you erased the video of the accident, the GPS tracking may have been enough to prove that you were in another area and not near the accident scene.

I don't have any experience with this kind of thing, but curious why your insurance company isn't more involved in either fighting or settling this.  The few times I've needed my auto insurance, it's been really hands off for me.

More information on this dash cam set up would help a lot there. :-)

KOT
Post 40 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 11:51
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
Here's a link to the camera:
[Link: amazon.com]

I installed a 12v to 5v transformer to connect it to the van aux power.  The 30 minute delay and power when door opens is a function of the van's aux power circuit and doesn't have anything to do with the camera.  I think most people just power them from the ignition so the camera records when the engine is running.

The camera also has a DVR function which records on motion, so I guess you could also leave it running all the time provided you drive the vehicle regularly so the camera doesn't drain the battery.  This might be useful if you're the victim of hit&run or vandalism while parked.

Here's a picture of it installed.  It's really small and discrete and in my van most of it hides behind the blacked out part of the windshield  beside the rear view mirror so it's not very visible from outside.  The cable on the left is a mini USB cable to give you a sense of scale... it's only about 2" wide and 3" tall:

www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
Post 41 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 12:01
ichbinbose
Select Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2011
1,824
I have a dash cam as well. with the way they drive here its crazy not to.
For what they cost vs. what they may save you, its well worth it IMHO.
Post 42 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 12:17
Mario
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2006
5,681
Paul, have you checked to see how long your recordings last.
My DashCam starts up on ignition.
In his case, if he was contacted 2-4 weeks later, the video might be long gone.

I wonder if there is a relatively easy solution that would automatically save the video upon returning home? Something WiFi based, or the likes.

I can't imagine commercial fleets or police departments doing manual remove/download/reinstall of hard drives or memory cards.
Post 43 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 13:21
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
Mario, this is a good point... I think I get a couple weeks driving time with a 64GB card, but I don't drive that much.
www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
OP | Post 44 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 18:44
thecapnredfish
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2008
1,397
On March 17, 2016 at 11:30, King of typos said...
You're right that they'll have access to Y/M/M and color via the tag number. But I was curious onto what the witness said was the Y/M/M and color. With a tag number of ABC-123. Trying to figure out if the tag number was mixed up some how here.

So if your vehicle is a 2012 Ford Connect white. And the actual vehicle is a 2009 Chevy van and black. But has a tag of ABC-132. Then having the witness describe what the vehicle was, would've made this an open/shut case for you.

KOT

Do not know what witness said. Progressives words were witness git the tag number.
Post 45 made on Thursday March 17, 2016 at 18:55
King of typos
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2002
5,280
On March 17, 2016 at 18:44, thecapnredfish said...
Do not know what witness said. Progressives words were witness git the tag number.

Wow. I can't see how that can be legal. I mean the only "proof" is a tag number. Tag numbers can be mixed up. Tags can be copied. Tags can be stolen. But a tag number and a description of the vehicle can not be mixed up for the most part.

KOT
Find in this thread:
Page 3 of 4


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse