This seemed totally appropriate:
On January 28, 2015 at 00:23, tweetymp4 said...
Put a sign on the rack, in the it panel, at mpoe etc that says you will shoot the cable installer
until I realized I hadn't read the rest of it:
$25 via pay pal if they call you before they do any work.
We all know this issue costs us money and or good will with customers. A few bucks on the front end is money well spent.
True, well noted, never thought of spending my money to keep from spending more of my money dealing with the problem... but why should I spend my money? I hope you bill the client for that $25 insurance!
I was surprised to see ingress brought up as an issue. I though the problem was egress, that is, cable signal broadcast out of open splitters or poor connections. The cable company trucks that go around the neighborhood with an antenna, sniffing for cable signals in the air, are looking for leakage. In fact, CLI, Cable Leakage Index, indicates cable signals detectable outside the cable.
On January 28, 2015 at 10:37, highfigh said...
I did an office last year and from start to finish & beyond, Time Warner screwed the pooch. I asked that the installer be there on a Wednesday so I could make sure the phones and internet would be working by the following Tuesday, because the customer was moving that weekend and calls to the old number were supposed to automatically roll over to the new number. I also asked that T-W call ME when they were on their way.
This story is as far as I got in this thread.
We're still not finished with a system in downtown Los Angeles. Time Warner needed to supply a signal that would be split to two TVs. The original estimate for delivery was
three months, and they're about to miss that.
They don't understand the concept of calling the day before they come out. Once they have you on the phone, they don't understand the concept of calling before they come out next time. Nor the concept of cooperating with us, taking our advice about what is where in the building... it's just maddening.
More next time, probably, when I read the rest of this thread.