On 05/15/02 16:06.25, Kristen on said...
Or does any else have other advice for programming these so that the not so techno-savvy customers who just want to "watch TV" can understand?
This does not answer your question Kristen, but usually only one or two people in a household even want to understand a fancy remote - Sometimes a secondary, inexpensive universal learning remote that allows the "not so techno-savvy" to just "watch TV" is an alternative to training. The "savvy" people can still pick up the HotRod remote and blast off.
On 05/15/02 16:06.25, Kristen on said...
Since I am very new to this type of programming (but not to computers)
That said, here's a little project for you: Take screen captures of your individual screens, paste them into MS Paint (provided you're using Windows), crop them down (If they happen to pick up any peripheral screen content that you don't want), and then cut 'n paste them into a Word.doc. From there you can size the images, arrange them, and use Word's drawing tools to point arrows to specific buttons. Make up and save a boilerplate document as a template and then you'll just have to edit it a little and import new screen captures when new functions, equipment, or screen designs are needed for another job. You should be able to make a nice little 2 to 4 page manual and put it in a cheap little report cover WITH YOUR COMPANY's LOGO on the cover. They can slip it under the couch, or hide it under magazines, referencing it only when they send their guests off in search of snacks.
If the screens alone are not visual enough bring the remote up to the screen you're currently explaining and then drop it in your scanner and get a shot, hard buttons and all. Crop it and drop it into your manual. When they come for another copy after they spill salsa on the original you can print one out, say you normally charge $5.00, and then hand them one for free as a good will gesture.
On 05/19/02 09:07.31, Shoe said...
"I think one of the problems here is that the feedback you are getting does not address your original inquiry..."
Excellent point Shoe:. HEY! Bose Custom Solutions Div. installers !! Share the intellectual wealth if you're really out there. (Or are you exploring the possiblilities of opening a satellite store in Sonora?)
On 05/19/02 09:07.31, Shoe said...
"...nor is it what you would like to hear."
Everyone's been feeling that, I guess it's time for me to romp on Bose and feel a little too..
Friends don't let friends hear Bose. Though not all four letter words belong in the same category it is serendipitous that the word Bose just happens to have the same number of letters as some other words that have been used in this thread to describe their products, not to mention longform derogatory terms like "twisty-cubes".
If it weren't so why would so many be saying it? If it were otherwise, why wouldn't most of us listen to Bose? They market to us, are we just deaf to the wisdom of owning Bose?
"Bose capitalized on this notion by inventing the 901(R) Direct/Reflecting(R) speaker system (1968): one of the first stereo loudspeakers to utilize the space around them instead of reproducing sound as if in a vacuum."
From this we can deduce Bose speakers are capable of creating their own suction.
Ten years ago I just gave a set of 901's away, there was definitely a vacuum created when they left. Lots of open space and no more funky speakers that demanded hard walls to reflect off of. (And don't even think about putting them in corners - In tandem, they become one device which emits a death-sound.)
You'd think that a manufacturer with products to be
PROUD of would readily provide access to the key features
AND specifications that make their products so desirable.
I went to Bose' website/s and found what little information was available to be quite vague, heavy on hype, and totally lacking in technical details/specs. The links leave you chasing your tail, back to the same pictures and you cannot "drill down" any deeper for more information.
Bose® Built-INvisible System
[Link: bosestore.com][Link: bose.com]On 05/19/02 01:43.42, Kristen said...
I hope that those of you who don't know what TS200, 400 and 600 systems are, will want to find out more about them, if for no other reason than to know what else is being installed out there in the name of Bose.
Using several search engines I entered Bose along with TS
nnn (200, 400 and 600 separately of course) as my search criteria and came up with only this:
[Link: hometech.com.mx]I also tried different combinations of the same search along with the term "Built-INvisible" - no evidence of the TS
nnn series could be found.
Perhaps technical specs and other secret information is reserved for Bose Custom Solutions Div. installers. (You don't get the skinny until you're in the boileroom = Amway business model.)
I do see that even with Bose' custom stuff they want you to richochet sound off your walls from little appendages full of small drivers. I'm not feeling confident that I'd like the outcome.
Okay, I at least TRIED to find out about the TS' series products before commenting, but I could not gather any information so I won't comment directly.
A friend of mine has repeatedly purchased whatever Bose system Costco or BestBuy is selling and put it on display in his showroom as a SELLING TOOL to market his other lines of merchandise.
He made sure to buy the highest Bose line available to the general public so people would see exactly what they'd just heard when they came to him from the mass-market stores.
I remember listening to the considerably more expensive Bose setup A/B'd against the (discontinued) NHT Wave Sub/Sat combo. All the speakers were within inches of each other in regards to placement and the wires could be visibly traced to the switching box for those wary of trickery.
It was a slam dunk - Two similarly rated systems and Bose was hopelessly outclassed.
After customers heard that they were instantaneously at one with the saleperson.
Not to mention the fact that if they still wanted upscale options he had Klipsch, Monitor Audio, NHT, Paradigm, Velodyne, and B & W in his lineup. If they were looking for more it was with confidence the customer walked to the room and the next level of equipment. The Bose name was instrumental in marketing OTHER SPEAKERS!
Granted this comparison was not with the TS series, but if you look at the Bose links above you'll see that the TS' infloor sub is steeped in "Acousti-mess" technology, and they expect your contracter to have accomodated them by pre-placing your walls so as to be an integral part of their "reflective" strategy. What if I have window treatments or textile wall coverings? What if that sound absorbing material is only on ONE side of the room?
To my untrained eye the TS series looks like LS in stealth clothing.
"Quality is remembered long after the novelty of low price is forgotten"
"When purchasing Oats, those willing to settle for Oats which have already been through the horse will find them at a reduced price"
On 05/19/02 09:07.31, Shoe said...
Customers usually chose other solutions after demoing the Bose against Elan, Niles, Boston, Adcom, etc.
Shoe is not listing the Creme' de la Creme', just some good upper to midrange solutions that provide decent ambient sound. If Bose can't compete in that horserace, why would anyone want their reputation to be pictured in the same "thought bubble" with Bose?