|
|
|
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
Topic: | uh oh This thread has 6 replies. Displaying all posts. |
|
Post 1 made on Thursday April 3, 2014 at 18:10 |
edizzle Loyal Member |
Joined: Posts: | March 2005 5,916 |
|
|
[Link: engadget.com]i swear, that thought ran through my head when i first read of them.
|
I love supporting product that supports me! |
|
Post 2 made on Thursday April 3, 2014 at 18:27 |
sbacon99 Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2006 79 |
|
|
Apparently they only use a photoelectronic sensor, not also an ionization detector, limiting the ability to detect "flaring" fires. So... it's much less good than a $29 dual-tech detector from your local big box store; it might not detect the fire *at all*, and even if it does, you may have silenced the alarm, so it won't go off.
But at least it looks good...
|
|
Post 3 made on Thursday April 3, 2014 at 19:23 |
MediaImageAV Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | June 2012 365 |
|
|
Received this:
As a Nest Certified Pro, we want you to have the latest information about our products. So please take a moment to read this letter from our CEO.
If you recently placed an order for Nest Protect, we will cancel the order and refund your purchase. If you have any Nest Protect inventory you’d like to return, please call 1-800-249-4280. We would also ask that you not sell any units you currently have to customers. We have sent a similar note to Nest Protect owners. If you get any questions, please refer them to nest.com or Nest Support.
We will provide updates when we have more information. Thank you for being a trusted partner.
– The Nest Team
|
|
Post 4 made on Thursday April 3, 2014 at 20:34 |
Zohan Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | September 2010 3,096 |
|
|
No surprise at all. I said it when they came out and ill say it again, I would never even consider installing any of those
|
|
Post 5 made on Thursday April 3, 2014 at 20:46 |
longshot16 Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | November 2009 3,442 |
|
|
Yeah no thanks. When I learned the tstats weren't PERFECT I shunned the whole line.
|
The Unicorn Whisperer |
|
Post 6 made on Thursday April 3, 2014 at 23:14 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 30,104 |
|
|
I can't wait till these guys start making burglar alarms pacemakers iron lungs scuba gear
What a stooooooopid "feature" to put on a device concerned with life and safety to begin with. This is criminally dumb. Can't get your ass up and push a button? W T F ?
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything. "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
Post 7 made on Friday April 4, 2014 at 08:17 |
designed Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | November 2012 296 |
|
|
What a joke. That was an idiotic feature anyway. Are they saying a wave of a hand during normal conditions disables the alarm from going off during a fire or only during a fire the false wave can be detected and then the alarm is disabled?
|
|
|
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|
|
|