I received a foward of this e-mail:
> From:
[email protected]> Date: August 23, 2004 11:01:57 PM CDT
> To:
[email protected]> Subject: Stewart ISF MEMO
>
> Stewart MEMO
>
> This is a response to Stewart's Sales Manager Joaquin Rivera from
> Joel Silver of the Imaging Science Foundation.
>
> Please make note as you decide which screen surface to specify for
> your various screen applications.
>
> Attached to this email is this letter saved as a pdf file.
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Hi Joaquin,
>
> Thanks for another great screen surface!
>
> Our congratulations on the addition of your new Gray Hawk material to
> our list of products certified for "High Fidelity Video".
>
> Measuring your new design against your previously certified products
> is a real world conundrum that we aspire to prepare our calibrators to
> handle during system design.
>
> We actually have a tough question in the certification test that
> deals with this issue. Permit us to share the question, and the
> answer, with your dealers.
>
> The question; "Which is a superior contrast ratio in a Home Theater
> system design - a projection system with a white measurement at 45.6
> Foot lamberts and a black measurement at .22 Foot Lamberts OR a system
> with a white measurement at 22.8 Foot Lamberts and a black measurement
> at .11 Foot Lamberts?
>
> (This is not a trick question - this as a HARD question. The math
> works out to be 207.27 to 1 for both systems. The correct answer is
> based on the response curves of the Rods and Cones in our eyes. Humans
> are hard wired to see Logarithmically - or in plain English -
> improvements in blacks are easily perceived as major improvements as
> opposed to any equal percent improvements in mere light output. Light
> meters see the results as being equal!)
>
> Now - with that in mind let's compare the Studiotek 130, FireHawk and
> the new GrayHawk screen surfaces. We measured all three using a HD2+
> single chip DLP, retail priced a little over $10K in a superb, but
> real world (dark wall treatments as opposed to lavatory black) home
> theater room.
>
> Measuring simple light output the Studiotek 130 was the brightest at
> 29.1 Foot Lamberts (fl), the FireHawk at 20.2 fl and GrayHawk at 17.8
> fl. Contrast ration were Studiotek 77.37 to 1, FireHawk 99.57 to 1 and
> GrayHawk 110.56 to 1. Remember - the visual differences were even more
> important!
>
> So.....what do we conclude? For dedicated theaters with well
> controlled lighting environments, the new GrayHawk material was best
> for the current generation of light valves like DLPs DILAs and LCoS.
> For rooms with some control over the angle of ambient light, the
> angular reflectivity of the FireHawk is obviously superior for dealing
> with real world challenges. For sheer light output where
> multi-directional ambient light fights black levels, Studiotek 130 is
> the winner.
>
> To paraphrase Winston Churchill, these choices are not enigmas
> wrapped in riddles inside conundrums - these screens are merely
> different solutions for different applications!
>
> You are offering your dealers proper solutions for the multiple
> environments we see every day in Home Theater installations.
>
> Joel Silver
> ISF