| Post 16 made on Friday September 3, 2004 at 07:28 |
DDeca Long Time Member |
Joined:
Posts: | November 2002
435 |
|
|
I just got my batch of RF-200 version 3.0 (URC let me send back all of my 1.0's and 2.0's).
What a difference!! I have already installed the first two at jobs where the older versions did not work reliably. The work flawlessly. The responce time is even better. And placement doesn't seem to be an issue.
If this holds true, then I am back on board with the MX-800.
|
|
| Post 17 made on Friday September 3, 2004 at 09:35 |
jmk8793 Long Time Member |
Joined:
Posts: | March 2004
84 |
|
|
Yes it is!! We have definatley had some growing pains with this product. This has been the most reliable rf product at that price range for us. Now that we understand its bugs. Food for thought, BETA TESTING in the field. Just say'n. Good luck.
|
KntRdr |
|
| Post 18 made on Friday September 3, 2004 at 10:54 |
jmk8793 Long Time Member |
Joined:
Posts: | March 2004
84 |
|
|
|
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our
Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product
click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
