Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
Should we install VHF/UHF Digital OTA Antennas?
This thread has 12 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Friday June 4, 2004 at 15:02
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
Are we screwing up by only talking about UHF antennas for digital TV? Are we forcing our customers to have new antenna installations in a few years by putting in UHF only systems now?

I have heard on this forum that there are some places in the US where digital channels are on VHF. After the deadline where all TV stations have to be broadcasting in digital, and they cease analog, won't that leave the VHF channels empty? Won't additional digital channels come in to fill those?

If there will be digital channels on VHF, I would much rather tell my customer that I am preparing him for the future and install a VHF/UHF system now, rather than have to sheepishly tell him in a few years,

"Oh, well, sorry, I didn't realize that there would be digital on VHF. Oh, yeah, sorry again, but I can't put the combo antenna where I put that nice little Square Shooter, so you will have to pay for an extensive installation now. Right, I know I could have done this right when you were building the house five years ago, but I didn't think about it."

A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 2 made on Friday June 4, 2004 at 20:07
AHEM
Select Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2004
1,837
My guess is that telling your customers that you want to put up an eight foot long antenna on their roof because you think that maybe someday they might use it would be met with a bit of disdain.
Post 3 made on Friday June 4, 2004 at 23:26
avdude
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
814
Ernie,

for what it's worth, I'm not hearing anything VALID about VHF being a reliable, or widely used, medium for the carriage of HDTV signals...

I did a little snooping around www.antennaweb.org a while back, and was VERY hard pressed to find much HD on VHF...

avdude
AVDUDE
"It might work better if it were plugged in and programmed first...just a thought!"
Post 4 made on Friday June 4, 2004 at 23:38
DavidatAVX
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
440
Our local ABC-DT is on 5-1. The only VHF in town. They are in a different location (so two ants). One VHF and one UHF with a combiner, while not the perfect setup it will do. VHF carries farther with the same power as UHF, I just don't care for the length of VHF ants.
Post 5 made on Saturday June 5, 2004 at 00:05
Impaqt
RC Moderator
Joined:
Posts:
October 2002
6,233
I probobly dont count because I'm in a Major Market with a VHF HD Station (CBS)....

all my Installations involves UHF/VHF Antennas. ANd for what its worth, In chicago, the Square Shooter picks up CHannel 2 (Broadcast VHF CH3)just fine. WInegard does indeed advertise it as a UHF/VHF Antenna.

Post 6 made on Saturday June 5, 2004 at 16:26
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
7,462
It's my understanding that the use of VHF for some HD programming transmission is a temporary thing.

Apparently the FCC waved the requirement for some stations to be online with UHF HD due to the fact that they were unable to obtain the services of a company to erect the needed towers.

I asked about this locally (local station engineer) and was told that it is indeed the case.

True or not?

Your guess is as good as mine....
Post 7 made on Saturday June 5, 2004 at 16:38
freddyfreeload
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2004
3,243
I dont think you will need VHF.
In the future it will be sabotaged by the government and used for cells, 2-way radios, etc. Anyone?
Post 8 made on Saturday June 5, 2004 at 19:22
freddyfreeload
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2004
3,243
Impaqt. True.
Most any comprehensive system would include a U/V antenna.
Modulated TV systems with RF satellite receivers and an off-air antenna are the way to go!!!!!!
Folks, Can you feel the IMPAQT?
Post 9 made on Saturday July 31, 2004 at 04:27
tvrick
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2004
2
in our market our abc affiliate is on vhf if they change that in the future who knows or cares hd is here now.
Post 10 made on Saturday July 31, 2004 at 04:39
HDTVJunkie
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2004
467
I'm in your market Ernie (greater Los Angeles) and if I'm erecting an antenna, it's always both UHF and VHF. So far as I know, the FCC has not re-allocated the VHF bandwidth yet. There was some talk about making it low wattage local access, but nothing firm. Not sure why I would need 7 channels of Fullerton TV, but with a monster antenna, I would receive it. If they re-assign VHF TV bandwidth to another industry, then I've wasted my time, and my clients money. It's just hard to tell what's going to happen at this point.
OP | Post 11 made on Sunday August 1, 2004 at 00:25
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
On 06/04/04 20:07, AHEM said...
My guess is that telling your customers that you
want to put up an eight foot long antenna on their
roof because you think that maybe someday they
might use it would be met with a bit of disdain.

Sounds like a pretty good reason for this thread, huh? That's pretty much what I had in mind!


On 06/04/04 23:26, avdude said...
Ernie,

for what it's worth, I'm not hearing anything
VALID about VHF being a reliable, or widely used,
medium for the carriage of HDTV signals...

I don't see any reason why it would be any less reliable. It is a matter of bandwidth and noise, I think, and VHF has served rather well in that regard; UHF has always been on the fringe (pun intended) performance-wise.

And of course DTV is put on UHF! In my market, we have 2,4,5,7,9,11,13; where would you stick a digital station in there? You have to make it UHF until those frequencies are clear. That is the other reason for this thread.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 12 made on Monday August 2, 2004 at 08:12
flcusat
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2003
1,326
Here in Miami we have FOX HD in channel 8 and ABC HD in channel 9. I use Channel Master's Stealhtenna all around the Miami area with good results and get a strong signals in both VHF and UHF
I'm always right. The only time I was wrong was the time that I thought, that I was wrong.
OP | Post 13 made on Monday August 2, 2004 at 12:34
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
On 08/02/04 08:12, flcusat said...
Here in Miami we have FOX HD in channel 8 and
ABC HD in channel 9. I use Channel Master's Stealhtenna
all around the Miami area with good results and
get a strong signals in both VHF and UHF

Well, enough said. I am going to be advising my customers that it looks like all the HD that they will need is now in the UHF band, and that we do not know what will happen in the VHF band. They will be fine for several years, which will take care of most customers.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse