Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
IR Receivers and Plasmas
This thread has 14 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Monday March 15, 2004 at 20:33
Jeff406
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
55
I know that this question has been asked in the forums past, however, now that I am experiencing the problem I am ready to pay attention to it. What has been the solution to installing ir receivers near plasma TV's? It activates the ir receiver while the TV is on and I am curious as to why it does that?

Jeff
Post 2 made on Monday March 15, 2004 at 20:55
AVXpressions
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2002
1,163
Hey Jeff,

Audio Plex and Xantech both have plasma proof IR receivers. SpeakerCraft just released theirs for shipment last week.

Robbie S
Post 3 made on Monday March 15, 2004 at 22:40
Patrick Johnson
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2004
1
Niles has a new 'plasma proof' IR receiver also available. Just remember that this is a 4 wire device only to be used with the new IR blocks. The old IR blocks are for 3 wire.
Post 4 made on Tuesday March 16, 2004 at 03:46
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
The best solution I have found is to use Marantz or Pronto remotes with RF extenders. There are NO spurious IR problems, and the extenders are actually cheaper than a sensor, power supply, distribution block and the labor to run the wire.

The only drawback is that someone at Philips was pretty dumb and made the split portions of the cables on their dual IRs too short. You cannot use these for two components unless a)you are willing to have them come in from the side, not from behind the units, or b)you are lucky enough to have a stack of two where one wire can go up to the upper piece and the other can go down to the lower piece. In these cases I replace the emitters with Xantech.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 5 made on Tuesday March 16, 2004 at 06:05
deb1919
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2001
344
It activates the ir receiver
while the TV is on and I am curious as to why
it does that?

Plasma TV's just barely meet FCC emissions guidelines. When on, they constantly spew out random crap across different parts of the spectrum, including the IR band. It's analogous to you trying to hear someone speak across a room full of other noisy people.

"Plasma-proof" IR receivers simply narrow the reception range down to normal IR's 38k vicinity. Some crap still gets in, just a lot less.

The best solution is to avoid IR repeaters around plasmas, and stick to RF extenders or RS-232. And ALWAYS discuss this issue with the customer before the sale to avoid a costly & possibly unfixable problem later. You can also reassure them that the plasma won't make them sterile or cause their kids to grow a third eye.

It won't, will it?

Doug @ HomeWorks
Post 6 made on Tuesday March 16, 2004 at 06:55
wolf359
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2004
222
On 03/16/04 06:05, deb1919 said...

It's analogous to you trying to hear
someone speak across a room full of other noisy
people.

that a great,simple way to explain it -mind if i use that one? :)
OP | Post 7 made on Tuesday March 16, 2004 at 07:14
Jeff406
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
55
Thanks for the info, I use Xantech quite a bit so I'll try that one.

Jeff
Post 8 made on Tuesday March 16, 2004 at 08:01
Bruce Sinclair
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2003
694
The plasma proof IR receivers work pretty well most of the time, BUT there always seems to be one stubborn component that won't always react well to the repeated code, Sonance navigator harbor, Scientific Atlanta cable boxes, the 15 year old VCR the client insists that you use after the system has been designed, etc. Stay with an RF remote and everyone will be much happier.
Bruce Sinclair CMB Integrations LLC DMC-E
"Those who are most critical, often have no real skills themsevles"
Post 9 made on Tuesday March 16, 2004 at 21:57
CHARLIE FREEMAN
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2004
4
NILES IS SUPPOSED TO START SHIPPING THE NEW LINE UP OF PLASMA PROOF IR THIS WEEK. HOW ANY ONE CAN SAY THEY WORK OR DON'T IS HARD TO BELIEVE SINCE NO ONE HAS THEM... I HAVE HAD TO SUFFER WITH RF. PLASMA'S AND HD DSS BOX'S CAUSE INTERF. WITH THEM ESPECIALLY THE MX600/800. I REFUSE TO SELL ANOTHER...I HAVE USED THE XANTECH PLAMA EYE, ONLY PROBLEM IS THE COST. I AM WAITING PATIENTLY FOR THE NILES STUFF TO COME IN. I HOPE IT WORKS.. IF IT DOES, IT'S WORTH THE $$$$$$
Post 10 made on Wednesday March 17, 2004 at 15:53
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
7,462
I've had a couple problems with the Xantech plasma proof IR receiver.

I. The cost of course.

2. Not quite as effective as they claim.

Want a better way to get away from the problem with a plasma set without going to RF, which is somewhat questionable as to reliability?

Use a standard IR receiver (mini or barrel type), mounted up in a light fixture, or somewhere FAR away from the plasma (a little logic IS required).

Mine is a barrel type IR receiver mounted in the ceiling fan housing. Works flawless!
Post 11 made on Wednesday March 17, 2004 at 16:24
Steve D
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2001
211
With Fujitsu's newer models I have been getting away with Xantech's "DINKY LINK" with a small piece of tape over the receiver to slightly reduce the amount of light. With some patience I have had pretty good results.

Just my 2 cents
Post 12 made on Thursday March 18, 2004 at 19:56
glaro
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
101
the only problem with the xantech is it wont pass the scientific atlanta cable boxes---I just switched to the audioplex and has worked near to perfect. There are some signal strength issues with certain devices which can be worked around--As far as RF for the pronto--Philips can suck my left nut if they think that rf piece of garbage is worth anything--
Who's the f--ing retart who designed those emitters. Sorry for the the anger there but why not dump a little more r and d into the rf and make something that actually works. i'll pay the extra 50 bucks
Post 13 made on Friday March 19, 2004 at 09:43
idg
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2003
18
To Steve D,

What a great idea. I put a Scotch tape (actually two of them are working better) on the IR window of my Echo 301 receiver and most of Plasma related sluggish IR performance are gone!
Post 14 made on Saturday March 20, 2004 at 11:20
HDTVJunkie
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2004
467
Interesting idea idg, but I think Steve D. was talking about putting tape over the thingy you point the remote at. Maybe black electrical tape, leaving a tiny area for light to get into the recieving module. Someone correct me if I'm wrong on this.

Plasma displays with IR repeaters are a fun combination. "Yes Mrs. Jones, that's correct. It's going to cost a zillion dollars and we cannot guaranty it's going to function correctly..."
Post 15 made on Sunday March 21, 2004 at 00:01
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
I was amazed once when I covered a Xantech dinky link eye with two layers of blue painter's tape, thinking that no IR would go through, to try to see if the interference I was getting was IR or something else; the interference went away and the IR passed through the tape!

Someone over at avs forum just figured out for us that the Scientific Atlanta boxes have IR modulated at 58 (maybe really 56) kHz. They made their system work by using a Xantech adjustable sensor, and I suggested that if they use one of those to snag the Scientific Atlanta box and a regular sensor to snag the 38 kHz tha just about everybody else puts out, then they should be stylin' !

This is similar to the idea Audioplex uses in their 4056 sensors -- two separate IR paths with two separate bandpasses so that both signals get put on the bus.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse