Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
Effective range of the RF from a MX-800 Remote
This thread has 6 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Friday February 27, 2004 at 13:15
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
7,462
I know what the hype numbers are, but I'd like some feedback from other custom guys on this matter.

Just how good/bad is it?

Take a typical "H" floorplan and use one of these remotes. The signal has to travel 20' across the room, through a brick wall, across a 20' inset deck, continue through another brick wall and then hit the RF receiver, which is across another 20'.

Think it'll actually work in this case?

I've always run IR just to be safe, but would go the RF route if it'll actually work.

I'm used to the lam assed RF remotes that come with Sony satellite receivers, so I'm very, very skeptical.
Post 2 made on Saturday February 28, 2004 at 08:45
ATANA_HS
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2003
86
Good Luck, I'm having problems getting one to operate reliably at 20 ft. line of sight to the receiver. Now, I suspect in my case, I'm picking up interference from the digital cable box and the other components. UR told me to move the reveiver away from the rest of the equipment, as far as possible and change the radio channel. I'll give it a shot next week.
OP | Post 3 made on Saturday February 28, 2004 at 11:25
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
7,462
I had a feeling.....

One more thing in the "never trust a factory rep list"....lol

The difference between a custom installer and a factory rep?

Custom installer will promise something and then deliver it.

Factory rep will promise something, and then let someone else figure out how to, hopefully, make it work.
Post 4 made on Monday March 1, 2004 at 16:42
mike_ayu
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2002
9
I'm using the MX800 in conjunction with all Xantech IR equipment feeding a zpr68 and a bunch of components. I put the MX800 receiver in the exact center of the house under the living room (as close to what we come to a basement in california.) Then the blaster from that receiver points to a dinky link receiver that feeds to the xantech system in the media closet that is at one end of the house. I get excellent coverage everywhere in the house and on 3 levels of decks. I do have additional MX800 receivers positioned with local equipment in one far end of the house, and I can get reception probably about 60-70 feet away, through 3 walls, including 2 sheer walls, but not all the way to the exact opposite corner of the house which adds a couple more walls and lots of duct work. The duct work seems to be more problematic than any of the walls (stone, wood or masonry.)
Post 5 made on Monday March 1, 2004 at 20:18
John Pechulis
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2001
7,127
Other than Cre$tron, I have yet to use an RF based control system with satisfactory results. They have all been unreliable. (Imagine traveling 2 and a half hours away to pull your hair out a couple of times!)

Crestron RF is solid as a rock reliable, just mucho dollars.
Post 6 made on Tuesday March 2, 2004 at 09:41
Don O'Brien
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2002
237
The RF base station can perform unreliably when located in close proximity to the equipment-cable boxes, sat receivers, dvrs all create problems(IMO).
On every install where I am forced to use this setup (money related) I run 6 cat 5 from the base station to a remote location in the attic for optimal positioning of the base station. It still allows me to use the IR routing of the 6 outputs and have alot of flexibility to move the unit around. I also prewire for the capability of installing multiple, discrete IR target in case I have to go IR/hardwired to get reliable performance.
You cannot determine the RF peformance of the MX800 during the rough in phase of the job. Before programming the MX800 test the RF performance of the unit with the equipment installed after the final construction work. Use the "read back" LED on the base station to determine RF reliability.
Post 7 made on Thursday August 19, 2004 at 04:09
beer
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2004
6
Effective range of rf from mx800 that's easy O"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
They really suck I am bald now because of dealing with them darn things


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse