Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
Plasma picture problems
This thread has 19 replies. Displaying posts 1 through 15.
Post 1 made on Friday December 26, 2003 at 16:24
Drzhivago
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2003
26
Just got done installing a Fujitsu 50" plasma (P50XHA10US)along with a Samsung HD satellite receiver (SIRTS160). I'm getting alot of pixilation and tiling on the entire screen, but it's much more noticable around the outside edges of the picture. I'm running component video and the picture looks great when it'being sent a high definition signal, but looks terrible with NTSC. I've installed 2 other 50" Fujitsu plasmas this last year and used the same Samsung satellite receiver and did not have this problem.

Any ideas on what could be causing this issue would be great.
Post 2 made on Saturday December 27, 2003 at 15:20
Greg C
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2002
2,589
More compression from DirecTV as they add more locals. The problem with a plasma is it reveals everything, both good and bad in the original source.
CEDIA University Designer CAT Team Member
CEDIA University Instructor
CEDIA Registered Outreach Instructor
Post 3 made on Saturday January 3, 2004 at 12:38
lorenzop
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2003
30
On 12/27/03 15:20, Greg C said...
More compression from DirecTV as they add more
locals. The problem with a plasma is it reveals
everything, both good and bad in the original
source.

How do we fix this compression problem? Any Ideas?
Post 4 made on Saturday January 3, 2004 at 12:45
McNasty
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2002
1,322
On 12/27/03 15:20, Greg C said...
More compression from DirecTV as they add more
locals. The problem with a plasma is it reveals
everything, both good and bad in the original
source.

Why would it effect compression coming from a seperate satellite? Locals are on the 101 bird while HD channels are on the 119.
Post 5 made on Saturday January 3, 2004 at 15:38
Greg C
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2002
2,589
, he said HD was fine, but regular NTSC looked like crap. As more programing is added to a satellite, more compression. Also the compression is not constant. Premium stations like HBO, Showtime, Starz get better treatment then CNN, ESPN, or HSN.
CEDIA University Designer CAT Team Member
CEDIA University Instructor
CEDIA Registered Outreach Instructor
Post 6 made on Saturday January 3, 2004 at 15:45
JMAV
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
13
Compression has to do with the amount of users on DirecTV's network. As there are more subscribers the more it degrades thier service. "We" can not help that. Only DirecTV can by upgrading thier end. As for the seperate Sats. The network is the network. Each sat points different ways. One way or the other the more people on the network, the worse it gets. This has been a problem with NTSC signals since satellite has been popular (especially plasma). If basic NTSC programming was good, you would see your local best buy and circuit city putting that on thier demos. Greg C hit it on the head with plasma. Most plasmas (especially Fujitsu) is hungry. Hungry for good food. Give it good food and it will produce. Give it bad food, it will show you how it feels. Besides HD Net HAIL HD Cable. My 2 cents.
Post 7 made on Saturday January 3, 2004 at 16:10
McNasty
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2002
1,322
On 01/03/04 15:45, JMAV said...
Compression has to do with the amount of users
on DirecTV's network. As there are more subscribers
the more it degrades thier service.

That makes absolutely no sense to me. I'm not saying you are wrong, because I really don't know, but I don't see why 1 dish versus 1 million dishes would make any difference. To me, that's like saying that if you had 5 million people out suntanning, that the sun would be less powerful than if 500 people were suntanning.
Post 8 made on Saturday January 3, 2004 at 17:03
Thon
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2001
726
I agree w/ McNasty, we need a better explanation.
How hard can this be?
Post 9 made on Saturday January 3, 2004 at 18:07
THXRick
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2002
241
Yes please explain this one JMAV..We all know about compression..And I always understood it to be Directtv compresing the least important video channels,to save bandwidth for the more popular ones..As for your explanation on my end..I spent some time (5 years) in the Army in communications and your theory would tell me that Everyone in the US is transmitting to the Bird and by doing so is somehow damaging its signal quality..Knowing this if we were transmitting enough to corrupt quality of the transmission being fed to the bird by DirectTV why are some channels bothered and not others?? Older Transponders??on those channels??See now I am not making sense..When you also factor in that both DirectTV and the subscribers are never really off line,and how long before we fry this Bird..This is an actual problem on military birds where they must get permission to increase or decrease power as NOT to fry the bird..

Bird=Sat for people not on the com. lingo..



THXRick
Post 10 made on Saturday January 3, 2004 at 20:06
DavidatAVX
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
440
Ah!! I broke the code.

Think of it as sound at XX level. Think of "we" as carpet 2" square tiles. The more tiles the more sound absorption.

Wait! Does that really work? Let me get back to you!



This message was edited by DavidatAVX on 01/03/04 20:24.
OP | Post 11 made on Sunday January 4, 2004 at 04:42
Drzhivago
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2003
26
As I mentioned before, I don't remember the other two Fujitsu units giving me this tiling problem. Granted the NTSC picture is not top notch, but it didn't have this extreme tiling problem. I'm surprised that this hasn't been an issue with more installers on this site. Is everyone directing their clients to use cable these days, especially when installing plasmas?

If I direct my clients to switch to cable, the next issue will be how to deal with the year subscription to Direct TV.
Post 12 made on Sunday January 4, 2004 at 07:22
glaro
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
101
i ve also ran into this problem recently. Most of the hook ups i've done in the past year have been with the samsung ts-160 and either a 40 or 50 inch fujitsu. recently i had a customer who already had the new sony xbr plasma and this was the first time i noticed the picture problem. At first I thought it was the plasma so i brought the reciever back to the shop and hooked it up to a fujitsu and still had the same problem. Then i thought it was a bad sat reciever, so i changed that and still has the problem. My next step was going to be to try the sony reciever. Then i was looking at the 20" lcd he had in his kitchen hooked up to a sd sony box and that also had the same issue. ??????What the f#$#@!!!
Post 13 made on Sunday January 4, 2004 at 07:49
festure
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2002
21
I've also ran into this problem a few times and i haven't found any ways to fix it. It is obviously Directv's problem but the customer doesn't want to hear that their $9000 TV looks bad when watching TV which is only about 90% of their viewing!!
Post 14 made on Sunday January 4, 2004 at 08:03
deb1919
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2001
344
Guys, the bottom line is when an analog station looks bad on a plasma, there's nothing that can be done. That's why they call it lossy compression. Once the information is lost due to over-compression, it's lost. There's nothing any of us can do about incoming services, all we can do is display them with as little further degradation as possible. So don't waste any billable time trying to make it look better, because the customer won't want to pay when you are unsuccessful...which you WILL be. Like the old saying goes, you can't polish a turd.

DirecTV doesn't care about the minority that have digital TVs, they know that the majority have old analog sets connected with RF, and still use the word "clicker". And if they can tell what Vanna White is wearing that night, they're happy. DirecTV will continue to add more stations not by launching more birds, but by cramming more into the existing bandwidth.

And as for the theory that more viewers degrade the picture, that's simply wrong. You'd have the same picture even if you were the only one in the country with a receiver on at the time. Now, if this were Cable we were talking about, you'd be right.

- Doug

This message was edited by deb1919 on 01/04/04 08:26.
Post 15 made on Sunday January 4, 2004 at 12:11
Thon
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2001
726
Let me take a SWAG (scientific wild ass guess) at this. I don't think the problem is entirely due to compression although that does degrade the picture quality. I think it has to do with the lines of resolution. When you send a hi-def 1080i signal to your plasma it can scale it appropriately for it's particular pixel count. When you send it half as many lines, I think the internal scalar gets reaaally confused. I think what you need to do is line double the NTSC signal before it goes to the plasma to achieve an "HD like" signal. If this works, send money.
How hard can this be?
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse