No, I have not installed one recently. and I do not plan on doing so.
Perhaps the RF is better now........ When I was doing them 6-7 years ago, the Range was bad. but thats not the primary reason I wont do them.
The button layout on the Intellicontrol is static. and those static buttons do not make sense to clients. You cannot reasonably control Tivos, HD Decoders, or DVD-R's with an Intellicontrol. The button layout just does not make sense to people for those application. Since 95% of my jobs use at least one of the listed items, that makes the Intellicontrol Obsolete.
For a universal remote to be worth the investment, anybody should be able to use it with minimal trainng. when buttons that are labled in ways that dont logically correspond to the command they are firing, it makes the remote difficult to use.
Maybe my logic doesnt make sense to you... Thats OK with me.... I'd just rather install a Marantz RC9200 over an intellicontrol any day of the week. I know when the next whiz bang gadget comes out a year from now, I can design a control page that incorporates as much control as the client needs, and the layout will make perfect sense to my customer. I dont have that comfort level with the Niles piece.
On 10/06/03 22:43, avdude said...
Impaqt...can you explain this to me? We sell a
ton of both, with programming, and I've yet to
see the ITC cost TWICE as much...in fact, our
cost, and therefore the cost to the end user,
are within $30.00 of each other BEFORE you add
the RF module to the Pro, then IT becomes the
more expensive unit...I suppose IF you added a
ton of sync sensing hardware (APC-2, AC-3...etc...)
then MAYBE you could have the ITC be 2X as expensive...I
reality, most of our customers are out the door
with either for about the same price, after programming
and tweaking.
Have you tried an intellicontrol recently? The
new antennas for RF are greatly improved and IN
NO WAY support you claim of marginal RF ability
when compared to the P.Pro...the intellicontrol
RF buries the pro...
avdude