|
|
|
Philips Pronto Professional Forum - View Post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
New user TSU9600 and Wifi
| |
|
Topic: | New user TSU9600 and Wifi This thread has 9 replies. Displaying all posts. |
|
Post 1 made on Monday August 16, 2010 at 16:51 |
jpcolin Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2010 47 |
|
|
Hello,
I'm trying to configure my pronto to get connected to my wifi router, but I doesn't seem to work. Maybe I'm doing something wrong The goal is to control my Bticino home controls thru the network. I have a dlink DIR 655 router. My home controls have fixed IP's and wanted to give my pronto a fixed IP, Also i have secure network
thank you for your help
|
|
Post 2 made on Monday August 16, 2010 at 17:02 |
gopronto Senior Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2008 1,453 |
|
|
Do a search for my thread on " you think you have anetwork problem " should help you out
|
Pronto still one of the best Wi-Fi Remotes, www.ikonavs.co.nz and [Link: axiumcontrol.com] Axium Control |
|
Post 3 made on Monday August 16, 2010 at 18:18 |
Lyndel McGee RC Moderator |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 12,994 |
|
|
A search for DLink 655 is also appropriate as I think some users have had issues with this router and pronto. I seem to recall seeing this model pop up with regard to which firmware was running on the router.
|
Lyndel McGee Philips Pronto Addict/Beta Tester
|
|
Post 4 made on Monday August 16, 2010 at 22:21 |
Paul Biron Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 142 |
|
|
Check in this forum for the options you need to specify for your router (for example: B/G only, SSID broadcasted, try WEP (or nothing) first). I have had success connecting with my DIR-655, but eventually replaced it because connections would drop every once in a while, even with the most recent firmware update available. If you follow the recommendations, you should at least be able to get it to work, maybe even with WPA (in my case, WPA was not a reliable alternative with the D-link). After that, check for longer-term connection reliability.
Hope this helps.
Paul
|
___________________ Pronto Level II Certified |
|
OP | Post 5 made on Tuesday August 17, 2010 at 17:03 |
jpcolin Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2010 47 |
|
|
ok i have connection now thanks, I have yet to try with WEP or WPA, because now i don't have a secure WIFI. any tips for this?
thank you all
|
|
Post 6 made on Tuesday August 17, 2010 at 17:26 |
Lyndel McGee RC Moderator |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 12,994 |
|
|
WEP is faster than WPA but WPA is more secure. I personally use WEP here in the states. Some users have created WEP network for Pronto that "bridges" into a WPA-based router in that Pronto can get to the internet for use of web-based content such as weather.com but is not available for incoming connections. Others have locked down their WEP networks on the router by specifying the allowed MAC addresses which can connect.
|
Lyndel McGee Philips Pronto Addict/Beta Tester
|
|
Post 7 made on Wednesday August 18, 2010 at 01:51 |
wall-e Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | September 2008 55 |
|
|
Note, it's really not secure to specify mac adresses.. You have tons of tools wich can break that. Also Wep is pretty easy to hack to.. Best thing to do is a seperate network, just for pronto. In my believe internet acces is not neccary, since almost everybody I know has a iPod or even iPad / mobile phone's / laptop's wich are much better in providing information. But that's just me..
|
|
Post 8 made on Wednesday August 18, 2010 at 05:33 |
Henrikus Lurking Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2010 4 |
|
|
I believe the better way is to hide your ssid and set-up a MAC address filtering on you wireless router. I found that TSU-9600 is not fully compatible with WEP standard, so I also not use WEP on my setup. Fixed ip should be better as long as no more 'new' connection that potentially make a conflict ip on your network.
|
|
Post 9 made on Wednesday August 18, 2010 at 09:42 |
nimnul Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2007 245 |
|
|
On August 18, 2010 at 05:33, Henrikus said...
I believe the better way is to hide your ssid and set-up a MAC address filtering on you wireless router. I found that TSU-9600 is not fully compatible with WEP standard, so I also not use WEP on my setup. Fixed ip should be better as long as no more 'new' connection that potentially make a conflict ip on your network. Hidding your SSID is NOT recommended. The outcome is very unpredictable.
|
|
Post 10 made on Sunday August 22, 2010 at 18:17 |
Stuart Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 22 |
|
|
My experience with the TSU 9600 and Dlink DIR 655 router.
It worked, most of the time (~95%). However 95% wasn't good enough. Periodically it would lose the wifi connection and it would take ~2-10 seconds to reconnect. I gave up and added a D-link DWL-G700AP wireless access point running no encription (per Philips recommendation) but using MAC filtering (TSU 9600 only) and broardcasting on very low power - it is located just a few feet away from the viewing area. Signal strength on the TSU is just 1 bar but it works 100%!
I haven't yet updated the firmware because there's nothing to fix! Stuart
|
|
|
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|
|
|