On August 13, 2007 at 13:00, Jeff Wagner said...
BTW, the problem here was that there were too many devices
clogging the MSC400. Remember:
Don't import duplicate devices (same device from multiple
MX configurations, CD when it's really just the DVD you
are controlling).
Don't import fake devices (Watch and Listen are considered
devices by the software, but they really aren't used that
way).
Don't import RS232 devices (create them from scratch in
the MSC editor).
While people have used dual emitters on the IR outputs
of the MSC400, trying to control 23 or 24 (or more in
this case) devices will work best with multiple MSC400's.
Jeff
This is not entirely true Jeff. I am Installtech's boss and have been following these events closely. We are both power programmers and are not novices. The MSC 400 has many small and irritating bugs, all of which we have been able to over come however. In fact it was bugs that originally forced us to import duplicate devices. At some stage in the life of the MSC, it seems that whatever bug was in the MSC firmware or MSC editor forcing that, has been corrected.
At any rate, your "guess" that this was a memory issue doesn't entirely hold water, as we started deleting devices and once we deleted about 2/3 of the devices in the MSC config, we were able to add in the serial device. We then were able to add back in all of the devices that we had in the first place, ending up with all the devices that there was supposedly not enough memory for. Granted, the editor may allocate memory in it's file allocation table differently, depending on the order the devices are added. Who knows though?
Another thing that seems buggy. On that supposed full configuration we were having trouble with, the only way we could delete devices was to delete them in the left tree pane of the editor. It would not allow us to delete them in the device assignment window, even though there is clearly a delete device utility there in that dialog box.
We gone through and deleted most of the duplicate devices in our showroom MSC config. We however are keeping our Watch pages, as they are the only thing that delineates devices from one remote to the next. i.e. We rename the watch pages on the remotes to indicate what area they reside in. This allows us better housekeeping in the MSC400 config tree view. I hope this is ok to do, it seem benign (other than taking up a little bit of memory). Please let me know if this will mess the programming up.
Don't get me wrong, we love the MSC400 and do sell a number of them. I do wish URC would polish this product and work out some of the weird problems and quirks. It seems to be a little shaky at times, and we have been forced to start new when adding devices or features to an existing configuration. It seems that URC engineers are stretched thin at times, trying to bring out new products when the existing products could use some refining if not debugging.