| Post 1 made on Thursday April 5, 2007 at 19:57 |
cma Super Member |
Joined:
Posts: | August 2003
3,044 |
|
|
What is the concensus on this piece so far? Likes.. dislikes.. Quirks..
|
|
| Post 2 made on Thursday April 5, 2007 at 21:19 |
CCD Super Member |
Joined:
Posts: | August 2005
2,731 |
|
|
We controlled a Mark Levinson MC40 with one via RS232. The ML was RS232 only, no IR. It worked pretty well.
|
|
|
| Post 3 made on Thursday April 5, 2007 at 23:12 |
BobL Founding Member |
Joined:
Posts: | March 2002
1,352 |
|
|
I'm doing quite a bit with it lately. We haven't had any problems with it and it is very flexible. I think better integration with the remote for programming would be nice.
If you are used to RTI it is like doing a system with stand alone devices even if the system has no stand alone devices. You have to go back and forth between the editors. For simple systems I'd give RTI the edge but for more complex systems it is a wash to me. Neither one is vastly superior over the other.
|
|
| Post 4 made on Friday April 6, 2007 at 00:58 |
BNC-RCA-RG59 Long Time Member |
Joined:
Posts: | November 2002
314 |
|
|
If you want it to work without IR using RF to activate RS232 codes, this baby works pretty well and the range is great if using the latest mrf350 antenna and the MX-3000.
BNC
|
DON'T BE FRUSTRATED, GET INTEGRATED! (From a custom installer) |
|
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our
Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product
click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
