Post 1 made on Tuesday December 16, 2014 at 17:46 |
BizarroTerl Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2002 591 |
|
|
Assuming I have a healthy wireless/wired network, in general what method has the least latency? MX-5000 -> IP MX-5000 -> RF -> MRX-1 -> IP MX-5000 -> RF -> MRX-1 -> IR
|
|
Post 2 made on Tuesday December 16, 2014 at 19:37 |
JoeFlabitz Select Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2008 1,517 |
|
|
MX-5000 -> RF -> MRX-1 -> IP Doesn't work this way...
A lot will also depend on the device, as not all devices have IP...
I personally would go RF>MRX-1(2)>IR unless there's a compelling reason for IP (2-way?).
|
|
Post 3 made on Saturday December 27, 2014 at 03:45 |
sorapp Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | March 2009 49 |
|
|
I use a mix of the 1st and 3rd methods. As JoeFlabitz said, the 2nd method is not possible. The 2 methods I use are both very quick on my MX-5000 with no detectable latency. However there is a huge downside with using IP on the MX-5000, it can take as long as 30 seconds to wake up if it has gone to sleep. Increasing the sleep delay time will cause the battery to drain much faster. The bottom line is that the MX-5000 is a power hog and you have to find a compromise between availability and battery life. This is my biggest complaint with the MX-5000.
|
|
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our
Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product
click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.