|
|
|
Complete Control by URC Forum - View Post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
Topic: | MSC-400 thoughts This thread has 7 replies. Displaying all posts. |
|
Post 1 made on Sunday October 29, 2006 at 19:43 |
Has anyone had a chance to work with the new MSC-400 yet? If so, are the commands more consistent and is the RS232 easy to work with
|
|
Post 2 made on Sunday October 29, 2006 at 19:56 |
GregoriusM RC Consultant |
Joined: Posts: | December 1999 9,807 |
|
|
Do a search. There have been a few comments on the MSC-400 in this forum.
|
When ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise. |
|
Post 3 made on Sunday October 29, 2006 at 21:26 |
BobL Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | March 2002 1,351 |
|
|
The MSC-400 is a very nice unit. The RS-232 works fine with the pieces I've tested it with i.e. Marantz, Sherwood, Infocus, Sharp, Theta, Gold-line, Velodyne and HK. The commands seem very consistent to me. I really like the unit.
Bob
|
|
Post 4 made on Monday October 30, 2006 at 10:32 |
shnakz69 Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | February 2006 737 |
|
|
use it....Love it...Recommend it!
|
|
OP | Post 5 made on Thursday November 2, 2006 at 01:48 |
Thanks for the feedback ! Just ordered one with all the new peripherals and sensors
|
|
Post 6 made on Friday November 3, 2006 at 00:42 |
Pete Harrison Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 1999 147 |
|
|
Hi Tekno you will enjoy your purchase - it's a great product. I have both an MX-3000 and a few MX-900's and it's great to have the macros reside in the MSC-400. This allows me to just set up the macros once and then have both types of remotes point to them. It's also great for long macros which I could never do reliably before with my MRF-300. I have a macro to set the locks on and off on my satellite receiver which takes about 20 keystrokes and it now works every time guaranteed. It is also great for favorite channel macros.
I have not used the RS232 yet and am just waiting for my Yamaha receiver to be added to the database. I also need to spend some time to see if I can have my Ocelot send ir signals through RS232 to the MSC-400 as well.
For DIY's it is important to have an easy way to hook up to your computer. My office computer is about 50 feet away from my wire closet so I ran a USB extension through Cat5 which works like a charm. This allows me to easily make constant refinements.
I have a video sensor connected and it works great. I was also able to set up some variables through the MSC-400 which allows me to use the same MX-900 file with a few edits in two different viewing locations.
Pete
|
|
OP | Post 7 made on Saturday November 4, 2006 at 03:41 |
Pete,
That's really encouraging . I'm not a huge Crestron or AMX fan, and the fact that their systems stored the macros in the command modules always gsve them the edge in terms of consistency. The Proto and the MX stuff until now stored them in the remote. I understand RTI also stores the macros in their reciever. It's the only logical way to do it given the realities of RF.. I'm, reall happy about it since i love the editing environment of MX300. They have really spent some time to make it powerful.
|
|
Post 8 made on Sunday November 5, 2006 at 21:14 |
skynyrdfan Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | March 2006 666 |
|
|
is urc going around the country giving training on this product?
|
|
|
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|
|
|