On February 17, 2006 at 17:43, jrubin said...
you
seem to be saying contradictory things in your
above posts about the "900A 006D 0000 0001 stuv
wxyz" format--
I don't see anything contradictory. What do you mean?
is this format (with stuv=CCss) the correct one
to use?
Yes, and from what was posted at the start of this thread AND what we've seen in CCF files for devices using the same code set, we conclude that st = CC = 18 for all these commands, while uv = ss = E7 for some of the commands and uv = ss = 18 for others.
