On April 10, 2007 at 13:54, harrybash said...
Thanx Grimmace. Your codes worked for me 100% if i replaced
all the 0015' with 0016's using my PSP.
The 15 vs. 16 ought to make no difference. Do you really mean they didn't work equally well before you changed 15 to 16?
Grimmace's codes look like they are just imperfect learns of the same set of signals for which Kupakai posted clean program generated codes.
But your codes
are not auto-repeating
If you really have some reason for starting from those rather than Kupakai's, most of them are easy to convert to repeating codes. Simply subtract 2 from the third value and change the fourth value to 0002.
The ones that start 0000 006D 0024 0000 are the closest to correct. Change that to
0000 006D 0022 0002 and they should behave indistinguishably from the perfect code.
The ones that start 0000 006D 0026 0000 would need to be changed to 0000 006D 0024 0002 and then they won't be quite right, but 0000 006D 0022 0002 would be wrong for those without other edits and 0000 006D 0024 0002 is close enough.
0000 006D 0022 0000 can't be fixed that easily.
0000 006D 001C 0001 (the '5' key) isn't right at all. Was that really in the "100%" you described?
