I don't see the need for a big development budget.
Obviously, the iPronto can send TCP strings via
802.11 - it just can't send them at a time when
they would be useful. The Gllobal Caché GC-100
could receive them (via a WAP or router). Instead
of assigning a CCF hex code to a button, it could
be assigned a TCP string using the GC-100 format
(about the same size string). Where's the big
cost?
I didn't say big development budget - just development budget.
I get the feeling that there are not many people still working on the iPronto now that the actual project design is completed and the unit is out - I think we have people fixing bugs but that's about it..
Phil
