On May 16, 2008 at 00:39, Daniel Tonks said...
This is why Dave was allowed back in in the first place.
I received a satisfactory letter of explanation, and he
served a month off.
However I do agree that he should apologize to those whom
he sent certain letters to, and that really should have
occured during that month off, so now I will allow those
with ACTUAL (and not merely referred) complaints with
Dave to be the ones to say whether Dave should be allowed
back or not.
I can respect your decision. However, I do believe that an email should be sent to Dave explaining that. I'm also curious if those individuals involved will report to you having received such an apology.