On April 15, 2007 at 18:26, Mr. Stanley said...
Well... I'm no scientist - (oh, you didn't know that?!?!)...
but the vast majority of scientists are in agreement on
this thing
Wildly incorect...
On April 15, 2007 at 21:39, AHEM said...
I believe that the issue here is that the consensous of
scientists believe that man's 21st century byproducts
are rabidly accellerating the natural change.
How the hell can you apply consent to science?
It's not possible...
You can have a concessus that says Ford Motor company produces an inferior product or that Jimmy's school has an ineffective reading program...
Mans 21st century byproducts are in large part process regurgitation's of existing materials collected from here and there. The earth in all it's massiveness has more than enough ability to absorb what little we've thrown at it. We may have the ability to make our own little slice of the world nasty and unlivable.... (I can't find to many spots like this in the US), but the earth will recover.
I might not be able to live at Chernobyl, but that hasn't stopped it from becoming a paradise for invasive plants and other species. Just because it's not up to your standards of living don't really mean the planets on it's way down the tubes does it?
On April 15, 2007 at 21:43, AHEM said...
As Simon and Garfunkel once sang "still a man hears what
he wants to hear and disregards the rest"
I love S & G as much as the next guy, but I'm not taking lessons from them.. Great music is great music.
Where's your argument? Got another song quote or link to follow?
Sure you can pollute.. Sure you can clear cut, but the earth it's much more powerful that we make ourselves out to be.
