Thanks again! That definitely sounds useful - I'm just not sure how much time and effort I want to be investing in ProntoScript...
I got my TSU9800 only last year when I ditched my TSU7000 for it. Currently all my devices are controlled via IR and I don't use any of the RFX extenders. I once had some RF-controlled power plugs that I could control directly with the TSU7000 (European model). Most of them were attached to lights and they got replaced with Hue lights.
I've only played a few hours with ProntoScript so far. I managed to connect with my home automation software (home-assistant.io) and I set up an activity to control my lights through that. Currently, I don't see many use cases that would require extensive PS coding. Reporting the TSU's battery state back to home-assistant was a thing I wanted to try for fun. Also, I'm thinking about controlling Kodi (kodi.tv) through its JSON API instead of IR, but that's only an idea for now.
So far I only tested small code snippets at a time and watched the debug output inside a _PS_DEBUG panel in the simulator. I've also applied the TCP patch for it, which is an enormous improvement. Still I'm not sure I would want to start any larger projects in PS. Currently I'm preparing my code in a decent editor and then copy&paste it into PEP3, which can become pretty cumbersome. Having most of the code reside in a custom library might ease things up a little, though.
As it is now, on the one hand I'm grateful for the flexibility PS allows you, but on the other hand I'd probably always check first if there's another way to solve a "problem".
