Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Original thread:
Post 30 made on Tuesday August 23, 2016 at 15:51
weddellkw
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2013
186
On August 23, 2016 at 13:38, Dean Roddey said...
But that doesn't solve the problem he was talking about, which is guaranteeing that content is being delivered to the rightful owner. You can of course encrypt the stream for each individual recipient. But, the overhead would be stupidly high. And, all that a thief needs to do is to get a key for himself (or steal someone else's) and then sell it, or post it. So you still need to be able to have some reasonable assurance the person on the other end actually paid for the content. Suddenly your legitimate access gets cut off because people all over the world start connecting using your encryption key.

One way you could do it is the reverse of what happens when you connect to a server using HTTPS. It involves verification of the identity of the machine based on public key certificates. But, that requires that every machine publically visible have not just an assigned IPV6 address but also an assigned DNS name (and dynamic DNS names probably wouldn't be accepted since they would also be subject to easy abuse.) In that sort of scheme, you'd have to get a certificate for your machine's DNS name, and register it with a well known certificate authority. Then they could be sure they were connecting to you (sans some unlikely situation such as a massive DNS infrastructure hack of course.)

Unfortunately that would be unlikely to be feasible, given that it's probably the only real means by which this could be done. For home machines it wouldn't be so much of an issue, but for all of those portable devices it would be rough.

And of course even then there's nothing to stop me from setting up a server with a certificate, and just re-broadcasting the content again. But at least in that case the person doing it has to take some risk by being publicly accessible.

[Link: arstechnica.com]


At the end of the day, I think KScape's Encore product line (in terms of features & performance) was positioned to be the ideal solution for integrators, but the pricing obviously would never allow for mass adoption. W/out knowing their costs re: R&D, licensing, storage and bandwidth costs it's hard to say whether they could have been more competitive.


Hosting Services by ipHouse