People who come here and announce that they're pushing a product get no flak from me, not that I'm a moderator. It's people who pretend to be the average guy who just discovered this one weird trick that.... but that's another story.

Anyway, you've been a member for 13 years and you've posted here and there. If you were going to be offensive to us, we'd have drummed you out on your ass A LONG time ago.

Not that I agree with the tone of Robert Archer's article. He calls his objectivity into question when he calls the product "no larger than a deck of cards" when the photo shows that it would have to be AT LEAST "no bigger than three decks of cards," and it's probably a bit bigger than that. If he states something so obviously incorrect as that, where do the facts in his article start? Is it all hype?