| Post 2 made on Monday July 11, 2016 at 14:00 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined:
Posts: | December 2001
30,104 |
|
|
People who come here and announce that they're pushing a product get no flak from me, not that I'm a moderator. It's people who pretend to be the average guy who just discovered this one weird trick that.... but that's another story.
Anyway, you've been a member for 13 years and you've posted here and there. If you were going to be offensive to us, we'd have drummed you out on your ass A LONG time ago.
Not that I agree with the tone of Robert Archer's article. He calls his objectivity into question when he calls the product "no larger than a deck of cards" when the photo shows that it would have to be AT LEAST "no bigger than three decks of cards," and it's probably a bit bigger than that. If he states something so obviously incorrect as that, where do the facts in his article start? Is it all hype?
| |
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
