On May 19, 2013 at 18:41, David Haddad said...
I'm afraid that I now need to add something else you need to understand :p - that an opinion on a year 2000 web page by a "certified special events professional", taken out of context, doesn't confirm your misunderstanding of what constitutes stealing and what constitutes intellectual property.
Sorry to be late to the party but as a lawyer by education I can assure you Termul's situation is not considered intellectual property. I would have found a comparable seating configuration from another company that had all the lights and bells that Fortress had and offered that solution with all the reasons why the seating was comparable and hopefully a better price. The seating supplier mishandled the situation and should have disclosed to Termul immediately they would not be offering him a dealership based on an existing dealer relationship.
